A controversial series of U.S. military strikes targeting alleged drug boats in international waters has ignited fierce debate over their legality and ethical implications, with mounting calls for transparency from Congress.
Admiral Frank M. Bradley, the commander behind these operations, has admitted that some of the targeted vessels were not headed toward the U.S., undermining earlier justifications for the attacks.
The strikes resulted in the deaths of several individuals, including those reportedly surrendering or clinging to wreckage, raising serious questions about the military's engagement rules and treatment of survivors.
As part of "Operation Southern Spear," these aggressive tactics have led to the targeting of nearly 90 suspected narco-traffickers, with claims of terrorist affiliations invoked to rationalize the use of lethal force.
Critics from various political backgrounds, including military veterans, are voicing concerns over the safety of U.S. troops and the potential violations of human rights stemming from these operations.
The unfolding events reflect a significant and contentious moment in U.S. military strategy, challenging the boundaries of lawful engagement while intensifying scrutiny over the country's counter-narcotics efforts in the Pacific.
Top Keywords
Admiral Frank M. Bradley/Pete Hegseth/U.S. military/Pentagon/U.S. Southern Command/