Trump vs Meyers
Trump urges NBC to fire Seth Meyers
Donald Trump / Seth Meyers / Brendan Carr / New York, United States / NBC / Federal Communications Commission /

Story Stats

Last Updated
11/18/2025
Virality
2.6
Articles
18
Political leaning
Left

The Breakdown 13

  • Former President Donald Trump has escalated his feud with late-night host Seth Meyers, demanding that NBC fire him for allegedly suffering from "Trump Derangement Syndrome" on his Truth Social platform.
  • The controversy intensified when Brendan Carr, the Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, echoed Trump's call, raising alarms about potential government pressure on media figures.
  • Trump's ongoing critiques of Meyers are part of a larger pattern where he targets media personalities who challenge him, particularly those in late-night television.
  • Meyers has previously tackled contentious issues, including scandals surrounding figures like Jeffrey Epstein, adding fuel to Trump’s outbursts.
  • This clash highlights the fraught relationship between politics and media, as concerns grow over the influence of government officials on journalistic integrity and free speech.
  • As Trump and Meyers continue their public sparring, the situation exemplifies the broader tensions in today’s political landscape, where media criticism and political retaliation intertwine.

On The Left 5

  • Left-leaning sources express outrage, condemning Trump's attack as a blatant assault on free speech and mocking the FCC chairman for amplifying his inflammatory comments against Seth Meyers.

On The Right

  • N/A

Top Keywords

Donald Trump / Seth Meyers / Brendan Carr / New York, United States / NBC / Federal Communications Commission /

Further Learning

What prompted Trump's call to fire Meyers?

Trump's call to fire Seth Meyers was prompted by Meyers' critical comments about him, particularly regarding the controversial Jeffrey Epstein emails. Trump accused Meyers of having 'Trump Derangement Syndrome,' a term he uses to describe what he perceives as irrational hostility towards him. This public outburst reflects Trump's ongoing grievances with late-night hosts who often critique him.

How has Seth Meyers responded to Trump?

Seth Meyers has responded to Trump's attacks through his comedy, often using his platform to critique Trump's policies and behavior. Meyers' style involves satirical commentary that highlights perceived absurdities in Trump's actions, which he has done consistently on his show, 'Late Night with Seth Meyers.' This ongoing tension has made Meyers a frequent target of Trump’s social media rants.

What is Trump Derangement Syndrome?

Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a term coined by Trump and his supporters to describe what they see as an irrational obsession or hostility towards Trump, particularly among his critics in the media and political spheres. It suggests that critics are unable to view Trump objectively due to their intense dislike for him, often leading to exaggerated or unfounded criticisms.

What role does the FCC play in media regulation?

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is responsible for regulating interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable. Its role includes ensuring that the media operates in the public interest, which can involve overseeing content standards and addressing issues like media ownership and competition. The FCC's influence can affect programming decisions and the overall landscape of media.

How do late-night hosts influence public opinion?

Late-night hosts, like Seth Meyers, play a significant role in shaping public opinion by providing commentary on current events through humor and satire. Their shows often reach millions of viewers, making them influential in framing political narratives and public perceptions. By addressing political issues with humor, they can engage younger audiences and provoke discussions on important topics.

What controversies has Brendan Carr faced?

Brendan Carr, the FCC Chairman, has faced controversies related to his public statements and actions that some perceive as politically motivated. His support for Trump's call to fire Meyers raised eyebrows, as critics questioned the appropriateness of a government official amplifying a political figure's demand against a media personality. Carr's previous comments about other late-night shows have also drawn scrutiny.

How does this impact NBC's programming decisions?

Trump's call for NBC to fire Seth Meyers could create pressure on the network regarding its programming decisions. While networks typically prioritize viewership and advertising revenue, public outcry from influential figures like Trump may lead to internal discussions about the content and tone of their shows. However, networks often resist direct political pressure to maintain editorial independence.

What are the implications of political pressure on media?

Political pressure on media can lead to self-censorship, where journalists and networks may alter their content to avoid backlash from powerful figures. This dynamic can undermine journalistic integrity and reduce the diversity of viewpoints presented in the media. It raises concerns about freedom of speech and the role of media in holding power accountable, which is crucial in a democratic society.

How do audiences perceive political humor today?

Audiences today have varied perceptions of political humor, often influenced by their political affiliations. Some view it as a vital form of critique and engagement, while others see it as biased or unprofessional. Late-night comedy can serve as a source of news and commentary for younger audiences, but it can also polarize viewers, reinforcing existing beliefs rather than fostering open dialogue.

What historical precedents exist for media censorship?

Historical precedents for media censorship include various government actions to suppress dissenting voices, such as the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 in the U.S. and the censorship during wartime, like the Espionage Act of 1917. These actions often raise debates about the balance between national security and freedom of the press, echoing current discussions about political pressure on media outlets.

You're all caught up